Azur Lane Ship Displacement Comparison (Real WWII Tons)
Compare 15 Azur Lane ship displacements from Belfast 11550 tons to Yamato 64000 tons. Enterprise, Hood, Bismarck and New Jersey standard data in tons.
Visual comparison
All values
Click any row to load it as Entry A.
| Name | Value | Context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| HMS Belfast Lightest here. | 11,550 tons | Royal Navy Town class light cruiser | Imperial War Museum: Belfast displacement 11550 tons |
| USS Enterprise CV-6 Tied with Hornet. | 19,800 tons | US Navy Yorktown class carrier | US Navy history: Enterprise standard 19800 tons |
| USS Hornet CV-8 Tied with Enterprise. | 19,800 tons | US Navy Yorktown class carrier | US Navy history: Hornet standard 19800 tons |
| IJN Shokaku Tied with Zuikaku. | 25,675 tons | Japanese Shokaku class carrier | US Naval Institute: Shokaku standard 25675 tons |
| IJN Zuikaku Same class as Shokaku. | 25,675 tons | Japanese Shokaku class carrier sister | US Naval Institute: Zuikaku standard 25675 tons, same class |
| USS North Carolina BB-55 Treaty limit class. | 35,000 tons | US Navy North Carolina class battleship | US Navy history: North Carolina class 35000 tons standard |
| IJN Akagi Post 1938 fit. As built 26900. | 36,500 tons | Japanese converted carrier, modernized 1938 | Japanese specs: Akagi standard 36500 tons 1938 modernized |
| HMS Prince of Wales Tied with Duke of York. | 36,727 tons | Royal Navy King George V class battleship | Royal Navy archives: Prince of Wales 36727 tons as built |
| HMS Duke of York Same class as Prince of Wales. | 36,727 tons | Royal Navy King George V class battleship | Royal Navy archives: Duke of York 36727 tons as built, same class |
| KM Bismarck 400 below Hood. | 41,700 tons | German Bismarck class battleship | German records: Bismarck standard 41700 tons |
| HMS Hood 400 past Bismarck. | 42,100 tons | Royal Navy Admiral class battlecruiser | US Navy history: Hood standard 42100 tons |
| KM Tirpitz 1200 past Bismarck. | 42,900 tons | German Bismarck class battleship sister | German records: Tirpitz standard 42900 tons |
| USS New Jersey BB-62 Fast battleship class. | 45,000 tons | US Navy Iowa class battleship | US Navy history: New Jersey Iowa class standard 45000 tons |
| IJN Yamato Tied with Musashi. Heaviest here. | 64,000 tons | Japanese Yamato class battleship | Japanese records: Yamato standard 64000 tons |
| IJN Musashi Same class as Yamato. | 64,000 tons | Japanese Yamato class battleship sister | Japanese records: Musashi standard 64000 tons, same class |
About this converter
Azur Lane ships map to real steel from 11550 to 64000 tons here. Belfast opens at 11550. Enterprise and Hornet post 19800 in the Yorktown class. Shokaku and Zuikaku tie at 25675. North Carolina posts 35000. Akagi posts 36500 after modernization. Prince of Wales and Duke of York tie at 36727 in the same class. Bismarck posts 41700 and Tirpitz posts 42900. Hood posts 42100. New Jersey posts 45000 in the Iowa class. Yamato and Musashi close at 64000. That puts Yamato over five times Belfast and 19000 past New Jersey. Hood sits 400 past Bismarck.
How to use it
Pick two entries and a unit in the top row. The three boxes below stay linked. Change any box and the other two update. One box holds a count of the first ship, one holds the matching count of the second ship, one holds the weight in tons or kilograms. Try 1 Yamato against Belfasts.
Rows use standard displacement only. Belfast uses 11550 tons per Imperial War Museum records. Enterprise and Hornet use 19800 tons per US Navy history. North Carolina uses 35000 tons per US Navy history. Prince of Wales and Duke of York use 36727 tons as built. Bismarck uses 41700 tons and Tirpitz uses 42900 tons per class data. Hood uses 42100 tons per US Navy history. Yamato and Musashi use 64000 tons standard. New Jersey uses 45000 tons Iowa class standard. Full load figures stay out. No figure here is guessed.
FAQ
How heavy is Yamato?
64000 tons standard per Japanese design records. Musashi shares the class figure.
How heavy is Bismarck?
41700 tons standard per German class data. Tirpitz is heavier at 42900 tons standard.
How heavy is Enterprise CV-6?
19800 tons standard per US Navy history. Hornet shares the Yorktown class figure.
What is standard displacement?
Ship complete and ready for sea without fuel or reserve feed water. Full load adds fuel and stores, so it is higher.
Sources
- US Navy Naval History and Heritage Command: Enterprise CV-6 19800 tons, Hornet CV-8 19800 tons, North Carolina class 35000 tons, Iowa class 45000 tons standard
- Imperial War Museum: Belfast displacement 11550 tons, length 186.99 m overall
- German naval records: Bismarck 41700 tons standard, Tirpitz 42900 tons standard
- Japanese records: Yamato class 64000 tons standard, Shokaku class 25675 tons standard, Akagi 36500 tons modernized
- Royal Navy archives: King George V class 36727 tons as built, Hood 42100 tons standard
- Yostar Azur Lane official encyclopedia for ship identity
Last verified: 2026-10-07 · 15 entries
More creature sizes converters
Godzilla and Kaiju Size Converter (Height Comparison)
How big is Godzilla? Compare 16 kaiju heights: Monsterverse Godzilla, Kong, Ghidorah, Shin Godzilla and more. Meters, feet and visual bars.
Aircraft Carrier Length Comparison (Overall Meters)
Compare 13 aircraft carrier overall lengths: Juan Carlos 231 m, De Gaulle 261, Queen Elizabeth 284, Fujian 316, Ford 333. Official navy figures in one table.
Airliner Length Comparison (Widebody Meters)
Compare 8 widebody airliner lengths in meters, from the A330neo at 63.69 m to the 777-9 at 76.72 m. Maker spec figures in a linked tool. for fans today.
← Azur Lane Oil Cap Comparison (Clearing Mode) · Azur Lane Ship Length Comparison (Real WWII Meters) →